这篇文章主要讲解了“Kubernetes中Node异常时Pod状态是怎样的”,文中的讲解内容简单清晰,易于学习与理解,下面请大家跟着小编的思路慢慢深入,一起来研究和学习“Kubernetes中Node异常时Pod状态是怎样的”吧!
成都创新互联公司主营延吉网站建设的网络公司,主营网站建设方案,成都app开发,延吉h5微信平台小程序开发搭建,延吉网站营销推广欢迎延吉等地区企业咨询
Kubelet进程异常,Pod状态变化
一个节点上运行着pod前提下,这个时候把kubelet进程停掉。里面的pod会被干掉吗?会在其他节点recreate吗?
结论:
(1)Node状态变为NotReady (2)Pod 5分钟之内状态无变化,5分钟之后的状态变化:Daemonset的Pod状态变为Nodelost,Deployment、Statefulset和Static Pod的状态先变为NodeLost,然后马上变为Unknown。Deployment的pod会recreate,但是Deployment如果是node selector停掉kubelet的node,则recreate的pod会一直处于Pending的状态。Static Pod和Statefulset的Pod会一直处于Unknown状态。
Kubelet恢复,Pod行为
如果kubelet 10分钟后又起来了,node和pod会怎样?
结论:
(1)Node状态变为Ready。 (2)Daemonset的pod不会recreate,旧pod状态直接变为Running。 (3)Deployment的则是将kubelet进程停止的Node删除(原因可能是因为旧Pod状态在集群中有变化,但是Pod状态在变化时发现集群中Deployment的Pod实例数已经够了,所以对旧Pod做了删除处理) (4)Statefulset的Pod会重新recreate。 (5)Staic Pod没有重启,但是Pod的运行时间会在kubelet起来的时候置为0。
在kubelet停止后,statefulset的pod会变成nodelost,接着就变成unknown,但是不会重启,然后等kubelet起来后,statefulset的pod才会recreate。
还有一个就是Static Pod在kubelet重启以后应该没有重启,但是集群中查询Static Pod的状态时,Static Pod的运行时间变了
StatefulSet Pod为何在Node异常时没有Recreate
Node down后,StatefulSet Pods並沒有重建,為什麼?
我们在node controller中发现,除了daemonset pods外,都会调用delete pod api删除pod。
但并不是调用了delete pod api就会从apiserver/etcd中删除pod object,仅仅是设置pod 的deletionTimestamp,标记该pod要被删除。真正删除Pod的行为是kubelet,kubelet grace terminate该pod后去真正删除pod object。这个时候statefulset controller 发现某个replica缺失就会去recreate这个pod。
但此时由于kubelet挂了,无法与master通信,导致Pod Object一直无法从etcd中删除。如果能成功删除Pod Object,就可以在其他Node重建Pod。
另外,要注意,statefulset只会针对isFailed Pod,(但现在Pods是Unkown状态)才会去delete Pod。
// delete and recreate failed pods if isFailed(replicas[I]) { ssc.recorder.Eventf(set, v1.EventTypeWarning, "RecreatingFailedPod", "StatefulSetPlus %s/%s is recreating failed Pod %s", set.Namespace, set.Name, replicas[I].Name) if err := ssc.podControl.DeleteStatefulPlusPod(set, replicas[I]); err != nil { return &status, err } if getPodRevision(replicas[I]) == currentRevision.Name { status.CurrentReplicas— } if getPodRevision(replicas[I]) == updateRevision.Name { status.UpdatedReplicas— } status.Replicas— replicas[I] = newVersionedStatefulSetPlusPod( currentSet, updateSet, currentRevision.Name, updateRevision.Name, i) }
优化StatefulSet Pod的行为
所以针对node异常的情况,有状态应用(Non-Quorum)的保障,应该补充以下行为:
监测node的网络、kubelet进程、操作系统等是否异常,区别对待。
比如,如果是网络异常,Pod无法正常提供服务,那么需要
kubectl delete pod -f —grace-period=0
进行强制从etcd中删除该pod。强制删除后,statefulset controller就会自动触发在其他Node上recreate pod。
亦或者,更粗暴的方法,就是放弃GracePeriodSeconds,StatefulSet Pod GracePeriodSeconds为nil或者0,则就会直接从etcd中删除该object。
// BeforeDelete tests whether the object can be gracefully deleted. // If graceful is set, the object should be gracefully deleted. If gracefulPending // is set, the object has already been gracefully deleted (and the provided grace // period is longer than the time to deletion). An error is returned if the // condition cannot be checked or the gracePeriodSeconds is invalid. The options // argument may be updated with default values if graceful is true. Second place // where we set deletionTimestamp is pkg/registry/generic/registry/store.go. // This function is responsible for setting deletionTimestamp during gracefulDeletion, // other one for cascading deletions. func BeforeDelete(strategy RESTDeleteStrategy, ctx context.Context, obj runtime.Object, options *metav1.DeleteOptions) (graceful, gracefulPending bool, err error) { objectMeta, gvk, kerr := objectMetaAndKind(strategy, obj) if kerr != nil { return false, false, kerr } if errs := validation.ValidateDeleteOptions(options); len(errs) > 0 { return false, false, errors.NewInvalid(schema.GroupKind{Group: metav1.GroupName, Kind: "DeleteOptions"}, "", errs) } // Checking the Preconditions here to fail early. They'll be enforced later on when we actually do the deletion, too. if options.Preconditions != nil && options.Preconditions.UID != nil && *options.Preconditions.UID != objectMeta.GetUID() { return false, false, errors.NewConflict(schema.GroupResource{Group: gvk.Group, Resource: gvk.Kind}, objectMeta.GetName(), fmt.Errorf("the UID in the precondition (%s) does not match the UID in record (%s). The object might have been deleted and then recreated", *options.Preconditions.UID, objectMeta.GetUID())) } gracefulStrategy, ok := strategy.(RESTGracefulDeleteStrategy) if !ok { // If we're not deleting gracefully there's no point in updating Generation, as we won't update // the obcject before deleting it. return false, false, nil } // if the object is already being deleted, no need to update generation. if objectMeta.GetDeletionTimestamp() != nil { // if we are already being deleted, we may only shorten the deletion grace period // this means the object was gracefully deleted previously but deletionGracePeriodSeconds was not set, // so we force deletion immediately // IMPORTANT: // The deletion operation happens in two phases. // 1. Update to set DeletionGracePeriodSeconds and DeletionTimestamp // 2. Delete the object from storage. // If the update succeeds, but the delete fails (network error, internal storage error, etc.), // a resource was previously left in a state that was non-recoverable. We // check if the existing stored resource has a grace period as 0 and if so // attempt to delete immediately in order to recover from this scenario. if objectMeta.GetDeletionGracePeriodSeconds() == nil || *objectMeta.GetDeletionGracePeriodSeconds() == 0 { return false, false, nil } ... } ... }
感谢各位的阅读,以上就是“Kubernetes中Node异常时Pod状态是怎样的”的内容了,经过本文的学习后,相信大家对Kubernetes中Node异常时Pod状态是怎样的这一问题有了更深刻的体会,具体使用情况还需要大家实践验证。这里是创新互联,小编将为大家推送更多相关知识点的文章,欢迎关注!
分享标题:Kubernetes中Node异常时Pod状态是怎样的
文章URL:http://scgulin.cn/article/pdsgpg.html